Identification of distinct subgroups of Sjögren's disease by cluster analysis based on clinical and biological manifestations: data from the cross-sectional Paris-Saclay and the prospective ASSESS cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Sjögren's disease is a heterogenous autoimmune disease with a wide range of symptoms-including dryness, fatigue, and pain-in addition to systemic manifestations and an increased risk of lymphoma. We aimed to identify distinct subgroups of the disease, using cluster analysis based on subjective symptoms and clinical and biological manifestations, and to compare the prognoses of patients in these subgroups. METHODS: This study included patients with Sjögren's disease from two independent cohorts in France: the cross-sectional Paris-Saclay cohort and the prospective Assessment of Systemic Signs and Evolution of Sjögren's Syndrome (ASSESS) cohort. We first used an unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis to identify clusters within the Paris-Saclay cohort using 26 variables comprising patient-reported symptoms and clinical and biological manifestations. Next, we validated these clusters using patients from the ASSESS cohort. Changes in disease activity (measured by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology [EULAR] Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI]), patient-acceptable symptom state (measured by the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index [ESSPRI]), and lymphoma incidence during follow-up were compared between clusters. Finally, we compared our clusters with the symptom-based subgroups previously described by Tarn and colleagues. FINDINGS: 534 patients from the Paris-Saclay cohort (502 [94%] women, 32 [6%] men, median age 54 years [IQR 43-64]), recruited between 1999 and 2022, and 395 patients from the ASSESS cohort (370 [94%] women, 25 [6%] men, median age 53 years [43-63]), recruited between 2006 and 2009, were included in this study. In both cohorts, hierarchical cluster analysis revealed three distinct subgroups of patients: those with B-cell active disease and low symptom burden (BALS), those with high systemic disease activity (HSA), and those with low systemic disease activity and high symptom burden (LSAHS). During follow-up in the ASSESS cohort, disease activity and symptom states worsened for patients in the BALS cluster (67 [36%] of 186 patients with ESSPRI score <5 at month 60 vs 92 [49%] of 186 at inclusion; p<0·0001). Lymphomas occurred in patients in the BALS cluster (five [3%] of 186 patients; diagnosed a median of 70 months [IQR 42-104] after inclusion) and the HSA cluster (six [4%] of 158 patients; diagnosed 23 months [13-83] after inclusion). All patients from the Paris-Saclay cohort with a history of lymphoma were in the BALS and HSA clusters. This unsupervised clustering classification based on symptoms and clinical and biological manifestations did not correlate with a previous classification based on symptoms only. INTERPRETATION: On the basis of symptoms and clinical and biological manifestations, we identified three distinct subgroups of patients with Sjögren's disease with different prognoses. Our results suggest that these subgroups represent different heterogeneous pathophysiological disease mechanisms, stages of disease, or both. These findings could be of interest when stratifying patients in future therapeutic trials. FUNDING: Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, French Ministry of Health, French Society of Rheumatology, Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, Medical Research Council UK, and Foundation for Research in Rheumatology.

Comparison between primary Sjögren's disease patients with high or low level of dryness.

OBJECTIVES: To describe primary Sjögren's disease (SjD) patients presenting no or low level of dryness and to compare them with SjD patients with oral or ocular dryness features. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with SjD according to AECG or ACR/EULAR criteria in our tertiary reference centre were included. Patients with high or low subjective symptoms or objective signs of dryness were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 509 patients were included for the comparison of patients with high (n=456) or low (n=53) level of subjective dryness and 472 for the comparison of patients with (n=359) or without (n=113) high objective dryness. Compared with patients with subjective dryness, patients without high subjective dryness were significantly younger (median 49 (39-62) years vs 58 (47-67) years, p<0.01), diagnosed earlier (median time from first symptoms to diagnosis 2 (0.5-4.5) years vs 4 (1-9.25), p=0.0056), more frequently anti-SSA positive ((83% vs 64%, p=0.008) and had less focal sialadenitis in minor salivary gland biopsy (69% vs 83%, p=0.02).The patients without high level of objective dryness (n=113) were also younger (51 (41-60) vs 58 (47-67) years, p<0.001) and were more frequently anti-SSA positive (79% vs 63%, p=0.002).In both groups, no difference was observed regarding disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with SjD, those without high subjective or objective dryness features had a younger profile, a faster diagnosis which may result from a more acute onset, were more frequently anti-SSA positive than patients with high dryness features.

Associations between ocular and extra-ocular assessment in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To assess associations between ophthalmological features and the main systemic biomarkers of primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS), and to identify systemic biomarkers associated with severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in pSS patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data was retrospectively extracted from the monocentric cohort of the French reference centre for pSS. We analysed data from the initial visit of patients admitted for suspicion of pSS and included patients validating pSS ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Ophthalmological assessment included Schirmer's test, tear break-up time, ocular staining score (OSS), and visual analogue scale (DED-VAS) for dry eye disease (DED) symptoms. Results of minor salivary gland biopsy, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, anti-SSB/La antibodies, and rheumatoid factor (RF) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients (245 females) with confirmed pSS, aged 56.6±13.0 years, were included, among which 37% had severe KCS. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, anti-SSB/La antibodies and RF were associated with conjunctival OSS (odds ratio-OR-=1.25 per OSS unit increase; confidence interval-CI-95%=1.05-1.49; P=0.01; OR=1.31 per OSS unit increase; CI95%=1.09-1.58, P=0.002, and OR=1.34 per OSS unit increase; CI95%=1.12-1.59; P=0.001, respectively). Both anti-SSB/La antibodies and DED-VAS ≥ 5 were significantly associated with severe KCS (OR=2.03; CI95%=1.03-4.00; P<0.05 and OR=2.52, CI95%=1.31-4.90; P<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Association between conjunctival OSS and systemic biomarkers of pSS indicate the crucial importance of conjunctival staining when pSS is suspected as a cause of DED. Conversely, patients with anti-SSB and DED-VAS ≥ 5 features should be prioritized for extensive evaluation by an ophthalmologist due to their association with severe KCS.

Normal salivary gland ultrasonography could rule out the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome in anti-SSA-negative patients with sicca syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relevance of salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) and its place in the diagnostic algorithm in patients referred with dry syndrome (DS) for a suspicion of Sjögren's syndrome (SS). METHODS: We included all patients assessed at our dedicated DS clinic from June 2015 to September 2019 for which a SGUS has been carried out. Images were read blindly and the worst salivary gland was scored according to OMERACT classification. Clinical features, disease activity and treatments were collected. RESULTS: 337 patients were seen from June 2015 to September 2019. 269 patients underwent SGUS. 77 patients were diagnosed with SS and 192 did not meet the ACR/EULAR criteria for SS: non-Sjögren's DS (NSDS). Of these 192 patients, 60 had another possible cause of DS, and 132 patients were diagnosed with SAPS (sicca, asthenia, polyalgia syndrome).SGUS abnormalities were significantly higher in patients with SS versus NSDS: 51% vs 8% for a score ≥2 (p<0.0001), and 43% vs 3% for a score ≥3 (p<0.0001). SGUS score ≥2 had a specificity (Sp) of 91%, sensitivity (Se) of 57%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 72% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 82% for SS diagnosis. SGUS's characteristics in SSA-negative patients were similar to the whole population (Se=42%, Sp=91%, PPV=42%, NPV=92%). The high specificity and NPV in this population could avoid labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB) in SSA-negative patients with normal SGUS (186 patients, 69%). CONCLUSION: SGUS is useful for SS diagnosis. If anti-SSA antibodies are negative and SGUS score <2, the diagnosis of SS is very improbable and LSGB could be avoided.

Brief Report: Monoclonal Gammopathy and Risk of Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the link between monoclonal gammopathy (MG), disease activity, and incidence of malignant hematologic disorders (MHDs), including lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM), in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). METHODS: Screening for the presence of MG was performed in 352 primary SS patients. Each patient with MG was paired with 2 age- and sex-matched primary SS controls without MG. Their characteristics were compared for the presence of risk factors for MG and for the relationship between MG and MHD. RESULTS: Twenty-six of the 352 primary SS patients (7.4%) had MG; 88% were women, with a median age of 62.7 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50.3-69.1 years) and a median disease duration of 7.8 years (IQR 3.6-12.8 years). The parameters associated with MG on multivariate analysis were higher disease activity, as measured by either the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.7, P = 0.0002) or the Clinical ESSDAI (adjusted OR 6.7, P = 0.001), and low C4 level (adjusted OR 3.4, P = 0.04). After a median follow-up of 6.3 years (IQR 3.1-9.5 years), 10 patients with MG had developed an MHD (38.5%; 4 had lymphomas and 6 had MM), as compared with 4 patients in the control group (7.7%; all had lymphomas) (OR 7.5, P = 0.002). The only factor associated with the risk of MHDs was the presence of MG (adjusted OR 5.5, P = 0.02), which was principally associated with an increased risk of MM (23% versus 0%; P = 0.0009), but not lymphoma (15% versus 8%; P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The presence of MG was associated with higher disease activity and an increased risk of MHD in primary SS. In the presence of MG, the risk of MM was even higher than the risk of lymphoma. These results suggest that regular monitoring of primary SS patients with MG for the emergence of both lymphoma and MM is necessary.

Quality of life and psychological status in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome and sicca symptoms without autoimmune features.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pain, fatigue, and sicca symptoms; quality of life; and psychological status between patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and those with sicca symptoms but no autoimmune features (sicca asthenia polyalgia syndrome [SAPS]), and to determine whether a psychological pattern can be detected in patients with SAPS, which could suggest psychological distress as the cause. METHODS: This cross-sectional, prospective study included 111 patients with primary SS according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria and 65 SAPS patients with no focus on lip biopsy and no anti-SSA/SSB antibodies. Pain, fatigue, and sicca symptoms were assessed using visual analog scales; quality of life was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36); and psychological distress by the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) questionnaire. RESULTS: No difference was observed between primary SS and SAPS patients for pain, fatigue, sicca symptoms, quality of life, and psychological status. Fatigue and pain, but not dryness, were correlated with both quality of life and psychological distress in both groups. For primary SS patients, physical and mental composite scores on the SF-36 correlated well with global severity index (GSI) scores of the SCL-90-R (r = -0.29, P = 0.006 and r = -0.61, P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with primary SS and SAPS do not differ in quality of life or psychological status. Although both diseases probably have a different origin, they may require the same psychological support or psychiatric care. The strong correlation between the composite physical and mental scores of the SF-36 and the GSI scores of the SCL-90-R in primary SS patients emphasizes the importance of the psychological dimension in results of the SF-36.